On 7th January 2015, two French-born Algerian Muslim siblings, orchestrated a terrorist attack targeting the personnel of the French satirical weekly magazine, Charlie Hebdo. The duo, self-identifying as adherents of the Islamist terrorist group al-Qaeda, callously murdered 12 individuals and inflicted injuries upon 11 others.

 

This terrorist assault, constituting the most severe security crisis faced by France in decades, reverberated globally as a shockwave, eliciting profound concern.

 

However, attention is currently focused on the motivations propelling these individuals to perpetrate a terrorist attack on the very nation of their birth. In the coming weeks and months, it is anticipated that French security services will diligently scrutinise measures to preclude future assaults on their sovereign soil. Nevertheless, I posit that the United Kingdom, particularly in light of its analogous experience with the terrorist attack on 7th July 2005, the London bombings, where all four terrorists were also homegrown, should glean instructive insights from this lamentable incident to prevent its recurrence.

 

 

Multiculturalism: Embracing Diversity Without Compromise

The very first thing that become apparent for anyone who come to the UK is the 'British tolerance'; a super quality that perhaps is unique to the Britain.

 

The notion of the British tolerance encapsulates a distinctive quality deeply ingrained in the social fabric of the United Kingdom. This characteristic extends beyond mere politeness or acceptance of diversity; it reflects a profound openness to varying perspectives, cultures, and beliefs.

 

British tolerance manifests in the society's ability to accommodate a multitude of viewpoints without succumbing to vehement discord. It thrives on a historical tradition of respecting individual freedoms and liberties, fostering an environment where differences are acknowledged rather than shunned. This tolerance is evident in the multicultural tapestry of Britain, where diverse communities coexist, contributing to a rich mosaic of traditions and experiences.

 

Moreover, British tolerance is not a passive acceptance but an active engagement with the world. It involves a willingness to engage in dialogue, learn from others, and adapt to evolving global dynamics. This adaptability has been a hallmark of the UK's historical resilience and its ability to navigate through periods of change.

 

In essence, British tolerance transcends a mere coexistence of differences; it represents a commitment to understanding, learning, and evolving as a society. It is a quality that, while not devoid of challenges, has played a pivotal role in shaping the inclusive and pluralistic character of contemporary Britain.

 

Nonetheless, regrettably, there is a concern that lies in the potential exploitation of this tolerance by certain noticeable communities, particularly  those originated from the former British colonies in the Indian subcontinent who adhere to Islam and wield it as a tool for their own ends.

 

While the ethos of British tolerance is grounded in openness and acceptance, there exists a risk that certain individuals or groups may perceive it as an opportunity to pursue agendas that contradict the principles of coexistence and mutual respect. It is not an indictment, but a discerning observation that these individuals are predominantly of Asian Muslims.

 

While one should refrain from generalising categorically, the truth is that Islamic extremism is of grave concern. If not dealt with, it could easily escalate beyond control, akin to the challenges currently faced by France, especially in some ghettos in Paris. Even the French police won't enter, as these areas have become separate entities.

 

Therefore, the potential ramifications of this egregious misuse of tolerance loom large, with the perilous prospect of the country's destruction on the horizon should the authorities fail to comprehend and effectively address the gravity of the situation.

 

 

When in Britain, Do as the Britons Do

It is an undeniable reality that when the prevailing culture within a society refrains from asserting itself, alternative cultures seize the opportunity to dominate. Regrettably, this is precisely the phenomenon unfolding in contemporary UK. While the commendable virtue of tolerance has been a hallmark, it has regrettably reached a juncture where tolerance has encountered intolerance. Consequently, British culture finds itself compelled to retreat, abstaining from expressing its inherent values, lest it be deemed offensive to the Muslim community, thereby inadvertently yielding ground for an alternative cultural imposition.

 

Undoubtedly, Hollywood, perhaps unwittingly, has played a pivotal role in exacerbating this issue. The pervasive influence of American culture, characterised by fast food and superficiality, has permeated the very fabric of British society, creating vulnerabilities and apertures for the infiltration and dilution of British identity by diverse cultural influences.

 

Hence, it falls upon sociologists and socio-psychologists to delve into the root of this predicament. Yet until that day, the educational institutions, particularly schools, should be identified as the focal point for intervention.

 

In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in London in 2005, the British government instigated various programmes in schools aimed at instilling British values. These values encompassed respect for the rule of law, individual liberty, democracy, and mutual respect, as well as tolerance of diverse faiths and beliefs. However, akin to numerous well-conceived initiatives that may appear sound in theory, these programmes have faltered in practical implementation. None of these fundamental pillars has resonated with a notable segment of Muslim Asians who harbour a palpable animosity towards British values.

 

Therefore, in addition to a policy of accountability, where any terrorist causing harm to the nation would entail repercussions for their family, an additional pillar should be introduced. This pillar must impart to the offspring of these individuals the understanding that tolerance is a reciprocal obligation and, moreover, that 'When in Britain, Act as the Britons Do!'

 

In other words, it is imperative for the British government to display intolerance towards those who exhibit intolerance towards British culture, values, and way of life. Simultaneously, the educational sector should unambiguously assert that compliance with the tenets of British values is mandatory, and the prevailing culture must unwaveringly uphold its British identity. Individuals dissenting from this cultural ethos, particularly those seeking to live under Sharia Law, are at liberty to explore alternative countries more congruent with their ideological preferences.

 

The other factor that is apparent is that some within the British government have failed to grasp the facts. Firstly, the dangers of Islamic extremism stand as the paramount peril to Britain, constituting the preeminent menace if not extirpated from the very fabric of British society. Secondly, Islamic extremism, as an ideology, transcends being a formidable adversary that cannot be contained; hence, it necessitates resolute and draconian measures for its eradication and permanent obliteration.

 

 

Islamic Extremism, the greatest Danger to the United Kingdom and Global Security

The imperative recognition of the multifaceted nature of challenges confronting democratic nations underscores the complex security landscape, with Islamic extremism emerging as a notable and nuanced concern. However, to cast it as the singular and paramount danger oversimplifies the intricate contemporary panorama of threats faced by nations, including Britain.

 

In the pursuit of intellectual precision, it is incumbent upon the British government to acknowledge the presence of various perils, ranging from cyber threats and geopolitical tensions to internal socio-economic disparities. Regrettably, despite this recognition, tangible and proactive policy measures aimed at addressing the root cause of Islamic extremism, the ideology emanating from the Islamic Regime in Iran, have yet to be formulated and implemented.

 

A retrospective analysis underscores that prior to the 1978 revolution and the establishment of the totalitarian Islamic regime in Iran, the concept of Islamic extremism was virtually non-existent. The subsequent emergence of Islamic extremism as the most pronounced threat to humanity can be unequivocally attributed to the Western world's lamentable tolerance towards the world's most intolerant regime and its reprehensible actions. The brutal massacre, killings, torture, and suppression of Iranians by the regime were met with a disconcerting silence from the West. On Western soils, the regime systematically terrorised and executed dissidents, exemplified by incidents such as the assassination of Dr Shapur Bakhtiar in France and the failed assassination attempt on Dr Amir Hossein Amir-Pariviz in London. Astonishingly, Western nations persisted in their dealings, inadvertently endorsing these egregious human rights violations.

 

This climate of economic and political tolerance on the global stage played a pivotal role in nurturing Islamic extremism within Islamic Sunni communities as a reactionary response to the perceived threat emanating from Shia Islam. The Western tolerance was construed as a manifestation of weakness, an exploitable vulnerability that extremists sought to leverage, even aspiring to witness the flag of Islam atop Buckingham Palace.

 

The confluence of economic and political leniency thus became a breeding ground for extremist ideologies, fostering a narrative that sought to export Sharia law and envision the triumph of Islam on the global stage. The Western world's failure to unequivocally condemn and counteract the egregious actions of the Iranian regime served to embolden extremist factions, further deepening the roots of Islamic extremism within Sunni communities as a reactionary stance against perceived Western acquiescence to the Shia Islamic threat.

 

 

Addressing Islamic Extremism: Strategic Solutions

 

1. Empowering Iranians: A Call for Liberation from the Islamic Regime

The potential mitigation of Islamic extremism necessitates a comprehensive approach that commences with addressing the Islamic regime in Iran. The pivotal juncture lies in facilitating the removal of Islam from the Iranian landscape, thereby dismantling the ideological foundation that sustains extremism. While such measures may not bring an immediate cessation to other manifestations of Islamic extremism, the plausible outcome is a discernible reduction in their prevalence. In other words, the process unfolds in two stages: the initial focus on the Islamic regime in Iran and the subsequent eradication of the regime itself, thus laying the groundwork for a broader and more effective global counter-extremism strategy.

 

Therefore, the British government, instead of exhibiting tolerance towards one of the most brutal and tyrannical regimes in the world, should adopt a proactive stance and assist Iranians in toppling the regime, thereby liberating their country from its oppressive grasp. By doing so, not only will Britain assert itself as an ally and friend of Iran, potentially yielding economic and political benefits for the UK, but it will also pave the way to combat Islamic extremism domestically.

 

This decisive shift in policy requires a resolute commitment to supporting the Iranian people in their quest for freedom and democracy. The provision of diplomatic, economic, and possibly even strategic assistance can catalyse the downfall of the oppressive regime. Such a move aligns with the principles of human rights and democracy that Britain upholds, reinforcing its standing on the global stage.

 

Moreover, beyond the immediate gains, fostering a liberated and democratic Iran would serve as a powerful deterrent against the spread of Islamic extremism. By dismantling the ideological epicentre that fuels extremism, Britain would contribute notablely to reducing the global threat posed by radical ideologies. The ripple effect of a liberated Iran could, in turn, inspire positive transformations in neighbouring regions, fostering stability and mitigating the risk of extremism taking root.

 

In essence, adopting a proactive role in supporting the Iranian people not only aligns with Britain's moral and ethical principles but also positions the country as a staunch advocate for global security. It is a strategic move that transcends immediate political considerations, offering a long-term solution to the multifaceted challenge of Islamic extremism while solidifying diplomatic ties and fostering economic opportunities for the United Kingdom.

 

 

2. Counterterrorism Measures: Managing Islamic Extremism Domestically

To deal with the issue at hand to exterminate the Islamic extremism from the British soil, is to posit draconian measures as the exclusive panacea, eschewing tolerance and dialogue, is to endorse an approach fraught with ethical and practical complexities. It is incumbent upon us to scrutinise the ramifications of such a proposition with a discerning and nuanced perspective.

 

While the imperative of safeguarding national security is undeniable, the efficacy of draconian measures merits scrutiny. An excessively punitive stance risks exacerbating societal discord, alienating segments of the population, and inadvertently fuelling radicalisation. The antithesis of tolerance and dialogue may precipitate an adversarial environment, impeding the prospect of fostering a shared sense of national identity.

 

Moreover, the concept of draconian measures necessitates precise definition, as ambiguity in its application could result in human rights violations and undermine the very democratic principles that constitute the bedrock of British governance. The preservation of civil liberties, even in the face of security challenges, underscores the essence of a democratic society.

 

A more judicious and efficacious approach would involve a multifaceted strategy encompassing intelligence and law enforcement, socio-economic development, and diplomatic initiatives. Addressing the root causes of extremism demands a comprehensive understanding of the intricate interplay between political, economic, and socio-cultural factors.

 

While well-contextualised security measures are indispensable, a myopic reliance on draconian measures to the exclusion of tolerance and dialogue may prove counterproductive. A nuanced, evidence-based strategy, informed by a commitment to democratic principles, human rights, and social cohesion, stands as a more sustainable and ethically sound paradigm in mitigating the threat posed by Islamic extremism.'

 

 

Conclusion

Should Britain fail to take immediate and decisive action, tomorrow may unfold as a day of reckoning, subjecting the nation to a scenario reminiscent of the challenges faced by Iranians since 1978. On such a foreboding day, Britons may awaken from their present state of complacency only to find their nation under the dominion of individuals with Asian backgrounds who, when gazing into the mirror, identify with anything but a British identity. The disconcerting prospect of the Prime Minister and all members of the cabinet being of Asian origin, clandestinely dismantling the very fabric of the country under the guise of public service, raises grave concerns.

 

Under their rule, the legal framework would be governed by a fusion of Sharia law and far-right agendas, manifesting in the imposition of restrictive measures such as mandatory Hijab for women, effectively reducing them to possessions. The spectre of Islamic terrorism would cast an ominous shadow over daily life, resulting in bloodshed and the imposition of tyrannical governance.

 

The cherished British culture, an intricate tapestry woven with history and tradition, would be methodically relegated to the status of an alien force, supplanted by an ideology antithetical to its values. The erosion of cultural foundations, accompanied by a deliberate marginalisation of historical legacies, would further contribute to the dystopian landscape envisaged.

 

Simultaneously, the economic landscape would witness a precipitous decline, plunging into a state of disrepair and ruination. The systematic dismantling of economic structures and principles, driven by an ideology fundamentally incompatible with established economic norms, would exacerbate the nation's plight.

 

This confluence of cultural alienation and economic decay paints a bleak portrait of a nation in the clutches of a governance paradigm shaped by a hybrid of Sharia law and far-right ideologies. It underscores the urgent need for proactive measures to safeguard the democratic principles, cultural heritage, and economic vitality that define the essence of British society. The implications of complacency in the face of such a perilous trajectory extend beyond the immediate socio-political sphere, posing an existential threat to the very fabric of the nation.

 

Shapour Suren-Pahlav

10 January 2015